Security routines

Security review that happens every week, not every audit.

Security routines re-review what changed — new code, new dependencies, new advisories — on a schedule, and separate what is exploitable in your context from what is noise. Runs are read-only by default and cite their evidence, so the weekly brief is something a reviewer can verify rather than trust.

Routines in security

• Weekly

  Weekly security audit

  Catch newly introduced security risks before they accumulate, with evidence a reviewer can check.

• Weekly

  Dependency vulnerability triage

  Stop advisory feeds from rotting in a channel by triaging what is actually exploitable in your code.

Works with

• L

  Linear

  Turn recurring findings into triaged issues, project updates, and accountable follow-up work.

• Se

  Sentry

  Review incidents and error trends on a schedule, then surface the changes that need attention.

• GH

  GitHub

  Read repositories and issues, then open reviewable pull requests through GitHub's remote MCP server.

See every integration

Common questions

What access does a security routine need?

Read access to the repository and security findings you connect. Write-like actions, such as opening tracking issues, need an explicitly enabled tool with its own approval.

Does it replace a security audit?

No — it covers the gap between audits. The weekly cadence catches newly introduced risks and advisory churn that an annual review only sees months later.

How does it avoid alarm fatigue?

Templates instruct the routine to prioritize newly introduced or materially changed risks and to file the rest as noise with a reason, so the brief stays short enough to read.