Work on Repeat
Menu
All guides

The best Zapier alternatives for AI-run recurring work

Five researched alternatives to Zapier for teams whose automation is really recurring AI work, with sourced pricing models and honest tradeoffs.

By Work on Repeat team · Published August 13, 2026 · Last reviewed

The short version

ToolBest forPricing
MakeTeams that want a mature visual builder with per-minute scheduling and granular per-operation pricing.Free tier with 1,000 credits a month; paid tiers start at $9/month for 10,000 credits, metered per module operation. Make advertises an annual-billing discount, so check which term the displayed price reflects. source
n8nDeveloper-led teams that want code-level control, LangChain-style agents, and a self-hosting option.The self-hosted Community Edition is free with unlimited executions; hosted Cloud starts at €20/month for 2,500 executions billed annually, metered per workflow execution regardless of step count. Cloud offers a trial rather than a permanent free tier. source
LindyNon-technical operators who want to describe a job in plain language instead of assembling a flowchart.No free tier — a 7-day trial, then from $29.99/month per user with 3,000 credits pooled across the workspace. Credits are consumed while the agent works and do not roll over. source
GumloopOps-minded teams orchestrating multi-agent workflows who want enterprise governance without per-seat pricing.No free tier — a 14-day trial of Pro at $37/month with 20,000 credits and unlimited seats. Credits follow a documented formula covering nodes, agent chat, compute time, and an orchestration fee. source
Work on RepeatTeams that want to hand a whole recurring responsibility — not a trigger-action chain — to an AI routine with explicit permissions.Free tier for proving a first routine; paid tiers at $10, $39, and $99/month metered by run starts and AI usage, with a custom Business tier. source

Pricing and capability claims come from each vendor’s own pages and were last checked on August 13, 2026. Vendors change plans; follow the source links for the current version.

Zapier is the default for a reason: nine thousand integrations, a free tier, and fifteen years of connecting form submissions to spreadsheets. If your automation is event glue — when X happens in one app, do Y in another — Zapier remains hard to beat, and this guide will tell you when to simply stay with it.

But a growing class of "automation" is not event glue. It is recurring work: the weekly security review, the morning issue triage, the monthly funnel report. That work needs multi-step reasoning, tool access with boundaries, and a result a human can check — and it is where the field around Zapier has become genuinely competitive.

How we chose this list

We compared tools on four criteria, using each vendor's own product and pricing pages as primary sources (linked in the table above, checked on the review date shown):

  • Recurring execution — real scheduling, not just event triggers.
  • AI capability — whether the tool can reason through a multi-step job, not only insert an AI step into a fixed chain.
  • Permission model — what the vendor states about controlling which tools an automation may touch, and when approval is required.
  • Pricing legibility — what the meter counts and how predictable a month's bill is.

We build Work on Repeat, one of the tools listed. Its entry follows the same structure as the others, and the tradeoffs column is as honest about us as about everyone else — several of these tools are the better choice for many teams, and we say which.

A note on a tool you may have expected here: Relay.app is shutting down — at review time its own site carried the wind-down notice, with free access ending mid-August 2026 and paid access a month later. We left it out of the comparison for that reason, and if you are migrating off Relay, its export tools produce a JSON archive of your workflows.

When to stay with Zapier

Stay if your workload is wide and shallow: many small trigger-action automations across many apps, each too simple to justify rebuilding. The catalog advantage is real, the free tier is real, and Zapier Agents now covers light agent work inside the same account — though its activity-based metering is billed separately from task-based Zap pricing, so watch both meters if you adopt it.

When to move

Move to Make when you have outgrown linear Zaps and want branching, per-minute schedules, and cheaper per-operation pricing. Move to n8n when you have engineers who want code in the loop or need self-hosting. Move to Lindy when the builder is a non-technical operator and the job reads like a job description. Move to Gumloop when you are orchestrating several agents and need governance. And consider Work on Repeat when the thing you are automating is a responsibility with a schedule and a deliverable — the kind of work you would otherwise brief a contractor on every week.

Strengths and tradeoffs at a glance

  • Make

    Visit

    Teams that want a mature visual builder with per-minute scheduling and granular per-operation pricing.

    Strengths

    • Three ways to build the same scenario: visual canvas, prompt-based building with Maia, or MCP.
    • Per-minute scheduling precision on every paid tier, including the cheapest.
    • An on-prem agent bridges cloud automations to systems on a private network.

    Tradeoffs

    • Per-operation credit metering makes costs harder to forecast for long, many-step scenarios.
    • The free tier schedules at fifteen-minute intervals at best.
    • The on-prem agent is a network bridge, not a self-hosted engine.
  • Developer-led teams that want code-level control, LangChain-style agents, and a self-hosting option.

    Strengths

    • Genuinely free, open-source self-hosting with no execution limits.
    • Whole-run metering: a fifty-step workflow counts as one execution, not fifty operations.
    • JavaScript or Python can be dropped into any workflow, and agent nodes compose with any workflow as a tool.

    Tradeoffs

    • Hosted Cloud has no permanent free tier — only a time-boxed trial.
    • The jump from Pro at €50/month to Business at €667/month is steep if you need SSO or Git-based version control.
    • Self-hosting shifts the operations burden — upgrades, backups, scaling — onto your team.
  • Lindy

    Visit

    Non-technical operators who want to describe a job in plain language instead of assembling a flowchart.

    Strengths

    • The fastest build experience of this list: a sentence, not a canvas.
    • A stated approval gate before consequential actions like sending email or updating tickets.
    • Credits pool across the team instead of fragmenting per seat.

    Tradeoffs

    • Per-seat and per-credit pricing compound as both headcount and workload grow.
    • Unused credits expire each cycle.
    • No self-hosting or on-prem option for data-residency-sensitive teams.
  • Gumloop

    Visit

    Ops-minded teams orchestrating multi-agent workflows who want enterprise governance without per-seat pricing.

    Strengths

    • The most transparently documented credit formula of the tools reviewed.
    • Unlimited seats on the paid tier — cost scales with usage, not headcount.
    • RBAC, scoped credentials, SCIM/SAML, and VPC deployment reach further down-market than most.

    Tradeoffs

    • No free tier at all, which raises the bar for a low-commitment trial.
    • Five distinct credit-consumption categories plus an orchestration fee take real effort to budget.
    • Pro caps concurrency at five runs, which heavier workloads hit before Enterprise.
  • Work on Repeat

    Visit

    Teams that want to hand a whole recurring responsibility — not a trigger-action chain — to an AI routine with explicit permissions.

    Strengths

    • Routines own an outcome (a security brief, a triaged queue) rather than gluing events to actions.
    • Every MCP tool starts disabled; write-like actions need a separate automatic-execution approval.
    • Every run leaves an inspectable trace of each model step, tool call, and result.

    Tradeoffs

    • A far smaller integration catalog than Zapier — built-ins plus whatever MCP servers you connect.
    • Not built for high-volume event glue; if you need ten thousand webhook-to-spreadsheet syncs a day, a classic automation tool fits better.
    • Scheduled and API triggers today; no event-driven app triggers yet.

If scheduled AI responsibilities fit your problem.

Browse the routine library, or prove one run on your own data before deciding anything.

Browse the routine library